Why McDonald’s AI Christmas Ad Backfired
- The Creative Lucas
- Dec 19, 2025
- 4 min read
Updated: Dec 23, 2025
Insights from a withdrawn campaign on creativity, technology, and emotional trust.
Holiday advertising follows a well-worn emotional contract. Every December, brands promise warmth, familiarity, and a sense of human connection. Viewers may not remember every ad they see, but they recognize immediately when one breaks that contract.

That is exactly what happened when McDonald’s Netherlands released its AI-generated Christmas ad. The commercial spread rapidly online, not because it moved people emotionally, but because it unsettled them. Within days, the campaign was pulled. What followed was not just backlash, but a broader conversation about artificial intelligence, creativity, and the limits of automation in emotional storytelling.
This was not a simple case of technology gone wrong. It was a mismatch between intention, execution, and audience expectation.
A concept that made sense on paper
At its core, the ad's idea was understandable. The holidays can be overwhelming. Crowded stores, packed schedules, financial stress, and emotional pressure. The campaign attempted to acknowledge that chaos and position McDonald’s as a familiar pause button. A place where things are simple and predictable when everything else feels like too much.

This type of message has worked before. Many successful holiday ads exaggerate stress before resolving it with comfort. The decision to use AI likely came from a desire to visualize that chaos quickly and intensely. Artificial intelligence can generate exaggerated scenes, surreal environments, and heightened emotion with speed and efficiency.
The problem was not the idea. It was how that idea came across.
When visuals undermine emotion
AI-generated imagery still struggles with the details that matter most in storytelling. Facial expressions, eye movement, body language, and the subtle physics of how people move through space. These elements are easy to overlook individually, but together they form emotional credibility.

In the McDonald’s ad, viewers noticed something felt wrong almost immediately. Faces appeared stiff or oddly exaggerated. Movements lacked natural rhythm. Hands bent in unnatural ways. Crowds moved like simulations, not like people. Lighting shifted inconsistently between shots.
None of these flaws was dramatic on its own. Together, they created discomfort. Instead of engaging with the message, viewers focused on the visuals. The emotional connection was broken.
This is where the uncanny valley becomes a serious issue. When something looks almost human but not quite, it triggers unease. In a holiday ad, where warmth and familiarity are expected, that unease becomes impossible to ignore.
Tone and brand identity collided
Another major issue was tone. McDonald’s has spent decades building an emotional identity rooted in comfort, nostalgia, and accessibility. Especially during the holidays, their advertising tends to emphasize togetherness and warmth.

This campaign leaned heavily into overstimulation and stress. That approach could have worked as satire if the emotional framing had been clear. Instead, viewers were left unsure how they were meant to feel. Was the ad meant to be funny, critical, or sincere?
When tone is unclear, audiences disengage. When an unclear tone is paired with uncanny visuals, confusion turns into rejection. For a brand with such a strong emotional legacy, that disconnect feels especially jarring.
Why the backlash escalated so quickly
The intensity of the reaction had less to do with outrage and more to do with cultural context.
Holiday advertising carries emotional weight. Audiences expect humanity and reassurance. When technology becomes more visible than emotion, people feel something essential has been lost.

There is also growing sensitivity around AI in creative industries. Many viewers interpret AI-generated campaigns as cost-cutting or as a replacement for human labor. Whether that interpretation is accurate or not, perception matters. When a global brand uses AI in a way that feels emotionally flat or visually unfinished, it reinforces existing anxieties.
Finally, online culture accelerates judgment. Once early reactions framed the ad as creepy or artificial, that narrative spread quickly. Screenshots, short clips, and jokes took over the conversation. At that point, the campaign no longer belonged to McDonald’s. It belonged to the internet.
Pulling the ad became a practical decision.
What this tells us about AI in advertising
This episode does not prove that AI has no place in creative work. AI can be an effective tool when used to support human creativity. It can speed up ideation, help visualize concepts, and reduce production barriers.

The issue arises when AI is tasked with leading emotional storytelling. Algorithms can replicate styles and patterns, but they do not understand lived experience. They do not feel nostalgia. They do not recognize why certain images comfort us or why others disturb us.
Holiday campaigns rely on shared emotional memory. That kind of resonance still depends on human judgment, intuition, and cultural awareness.
McDonald’s did not fail because it used AI. It failed because it placed AI at the center of a message that required emotional subtlety.
A clear lesson for brands
Innovation is not defined by the technology used, but by how well it serves the story. Audiences are not rejecting AI outright. They are rejecting work that feels emotionally hollow or visually untrustworthy.
Brands that succeed with AI will be those that understand its limits. They will use it as a tool, not a substitute. They will test not only how something looks, but how it feels.
The McDonald’s AI Christmas ad will likely be remembered less for its concept and more for the reaction it sparked. That reaction is telling. People still value authenticity. They still expect warmth. And they can sense when something is missing, even if they cannot explain why.
Technology will continue to evolve. Emotional intelligence remains essential!
Lucas Mestemacher Pinheiro.


Comments